Work / Syzito

Syzito

EdTech prototype

Process-Aware Academic Writing Platform

Visit live site

Process-aware academic writing platform where students, teachers, and AI reason through the writing together — currently shipping as the Writey Thing prototype.

Syzito — reasoning together in academic writing

Process-aware academic writing platform where students, teachers, and AI reason through the writing together — not just at milestones and the final draft. Currently shipping as the Writey Thing prototype at writeything.benjaminloschen.com.

The name

Syzito comes from the Greek verb syzētōsyn (together) + zēteō (to seek, inquire). In classical usage it means "to examine together, discuss, investigate, reason together," not just casually talk. That's the product thesis: not producing a finished essay, but seeing and supporting the joint process of inquiry between student, teacher, and AI.

The problem it solves

Students hit blank-page pressure and can't see their own revision process
Teachers only see endpoints — the draft, the rubric, the grade — and miss where thinking actually happens (and where AI participation actually happens)
Traditional feedback disconnects from observable writing behavior, so interventions are guesses

What's unique

Process visibility over product focus — reason together through the entire writing process, not just at milestones and the final draft
Transparent AI participation — the system clearly shows where AI contributes to the shared inquiry, not as a black box
Evidence-linked interventions — every insight points back to visible writing behavior
Replayable history — teachers can review the evolution of student thinking chronologically, including typed-vs-pasted and AI-use signals

Product surface (prototype)

Student side:

Guided drafting with in-flow AI support
Revision replay showing idea evolution
Per-session reflection prompts
Assignment dashboard, student report view

Teacher side:

Triage dashboard with revision density, typed-vs-pasted ratio, AI-use indicators
Assignment setup flow with rubric-driven grading + Canvas integration
Session overview + session review with timeline markers
Evidence-linked summaries for intervention notes
Course assignments list, grading review/send modal

Tech stack

Next.js 16 (App Router) + React 19 + TypeScript + Tailwind v4
Radix UI + shadcn/ui for primitives; Tiptap 3 for the writing editor (with highlight, placeholder, underline extensions)
React Hook Form + Zod for forms and validation
Recharts for triage dashboards
Driver.js for guided tours of the student/teacher flows
Vercel Analytics for usage
Built as a v0 prototype, then taken into a full Next.js app with the design system extracted into a coherent component library

What I'd take to v1

The prototype validates the interaction model — process timeline, evidence-linked review, AI transparency — across both student and teacher flows. A production v1 would add: a real event-sourced data model (the Event Model Spec and Data Model Spec are written), a privacy / governance posture for student data (FERPA + AB-2273 considerations), Canvas/LMS integrations beyond the rubric stub, and an authorship-likelihood analysis surface (drafted in the feature docs).